<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Sugar Cookie and the Strawberry	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://social-legacy.com/the-sugar-cookie-and-the-strawberry-millenials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://social-legacy.com/the-sugar-cookie-and-the-strawberry-millenials/</link>
	<description>by Emily Chang</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2023 23:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Emily Chang		</title>
		<link>https://social-legacy.com/the-sugar-cookie-and-the-strawberry-millenials/#comment-750</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Chang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2023 23:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://social-legacy.com/?p=6278#comment-750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://social-legacy.com/the-sugar-cookie-and-the-strawberry-millenials/#comment-739&quot;&gt;Minter Dial&lt;/a&gt;.

What a thoughtful post, Minter! There’s certainly no one right answer as context, relationship, and experience all inform how we respond in a given moment. As for me? I’d like to think I could endure the sugar cookie treatment and help strawberries thrive. In honesty, I’m probably more built to the former but I’m also working on the latter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://social-legacy.com/the-sugar-cookie-and-the-strawberry-millenials/#comment-739">Minter Dial</a>.</p>
<p>What a thoughtful post, Minter! There’s certainly no one right answer as context, relationship, and experience all inform how we respond in a given moment. As for me? I’d like to think I could endure the sugar cookie treatment and help strawberries thrive. In honesty, I’m probably more built to the former but I’m also working on the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Minter Dial		</title>
		<link>https://social-legacy.com/the-sugar-cookie-and-the-strawberry-millenials/#comment-739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minter Dial]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://social-legacy.com/?p=6278#comment-739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed this post, Emily. You bring up a major and most sensitive topic. In the &#039;old&#039; days, we used to talk about having a stiff upper lip and considering it an honorable attitude. Today, it&#039;s generally considered as unhealthy (i.e. too &quot;hard&quot;). Certainly the extent to which we were obliged to have a stiff upper lip was sometimes exaggerated, but in swinging the other way (toward the strawberry), it&#039;s hard to imagine how resilience is built without the experience of true hardships. Today, we seem to prefer the precautionary route, making things safe... While noble in principle, I have to believe that, should (i.e. when) the sh*t truly hits the fan, we will be less well equipped to deal with major hardship. To the point of &quot;lack of war and political persecution&quot; it seems that in their absence, we would rather create new problems and hardships that, in our minds, already seem huge. But wherein lies due perspective?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this post, Emily. You bring up a major and most sensitive topic. In the &#8216;old&#8217; days, we used to talk about having a stiff upper lip and considering it an honorable attitude. Today, it&#8217;s generally considered as unhealthy (i.e. too &#8220;hard&#8221;). Certainly the extent to which we were obliged to have a stiff upper lip was sometimes exaggerated, but in swinging the other way (toward the strawberry), it&#8217;s hard to imagine how resilience is built without the experience of true hardships. Today, we seem to prefer the precautionary route, making things safe&#8230; While noble in principle, I have to believe that, should (i.e. when) the sh*t truly hits the fan, we will be less well equipped to deal with major hardship. To the point of &#8220;lack of war and political persecution&#8221; it seems that in their absence, we would rather create new problems and hardships that, in our minds, already seem huge. But wherein lies due perspective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
